The Frege-Hilbert Controversy in Context.
Wann
Freitag, 1. Dezember 2023
11:45 bis 13:15 Uhr
Wo
D 435
Veranstaltet von
Leon Horsten, Carolin Antos, Sam Roberts
Vortragende Person/Vortragende Personen:
Tabea Rohr (CNRS, Université Paris Cité)
Abstract:
This paper aims to show that Frege’s and Hilbert’s mutual disagreement results from different notions of Anschauung and their relation to axioms. In the first section of the paper, evidence is provided to support that Frege and Hilbert were influenced by the same developments of 19th-century geometry, in particular the work of Gauss, Plücker, and von Staudt. The second section of the paper shows that Frege and Hilbert take different approaches to deal with the problems that the developments in 19th-century geometry posed for the traditional Kantian philosophy ofmathematics. Frege maintains that Anschauung is a source of knowledge by which we acknowledge geometrical axioms as true. For Hilbert, in contrast, axioms provide one of several correct “pictures” of reality. Hilbert’s position is thereby deeply influenced by epistemological ideas from Hertz and Helmholtz, and, in turn, influenced the neo-Kantian Cassirer.
The paper can be downloaded here.
The Frege-Hilbert Controversy in Context.
Wann
Freitag, 1. Dezember 2023
11:45 bis 13:15 Uhr
Wo
D 435
Veranstaltet von
Leon Horsten, Carolin Antos, Sam Roberts
Vortragende Person/Vortragende Personen:
Tabea Rohr (CNRS, Université Paris Cité)
Abstract:
This paper aims to show that Frege’s and Hilbert’s mutual disagreement results from different notions of Anschauung and their relation to axioms. In the first section of the paper, evidence is provided to support that Frege and Hilbert were influenced by the same developments of 19th-century geometry, in particular the work of Gauss, Plücker, and von Staudt. The second section of the paper shows that Frege and Hilbert take different approaches to deal with the problems that the developments in 19th-century geometry posed for the traditional Kantian philosophy ofmathematics. Frege maintains that Anschauung is a source of knowledge by which we acknowledge geometrical axioms as true. For Hilbert, in contrast, axioms provide one of several correct “pictures” of reality. Hilbert’s position is thereby deeply influenced by epistemological ideas from Hertz and Helmholtz, and, in turn, influenced the neo-Kantian Cassirer.
The paper can be downloaded here.